you will be able to find about 100+ postings for that on this site over the years. You would think being so close to city hall and the Dept of traffic and Parking that this would have been done when they built elm street.
Its the only intersection on a multilane street I can think of downtown that doesn't have a crosswalk.
Project 92-666 incorporates this intersection as part of replacing existing signal infrastructure. This project also includes the improvement of pedestrian signals. Currently, the project is in the design phase, with a projected approval of design by September of 2014. This date is not exact and may be subject to change. Additional information regarding this project will be posted here in the coming months.
Can the bike lane be extended all the way down Elm? It currently runs all the way from York to Orange, but doesn't for the last block. Narrowing the travel lanes could help reduce speeding, which is the root of the issue here.
8 评论s
It will never happen (客人)
you will be able to find about 100+ postings for that on this site over the years. You would think being so close to city hall and the Dept of traffic and Parking that this would have been done when they built elm street.
Its the only intersection on a multilane street I can think of downtown that doesn't have a crosswalk.
MableX (注册用户)
guest (客人)
已确认 Department of Transportation, Traffic and Parking (注册用户)
Doug Hausladen (注册用户)
CT Livable Streets Campaign (注册用户)
GregL (注册用户)
关闭 TT&P Workflow Inegration (官方验证)