They're blocking our entire fire lane and both directions to access our homes.

Is this between the Radiance and the Madrone?
You should talk to the building managers as it should be their responsibility to instruct these contractors with vehicles as to where to park legally.

The manager of the Madrone seems to be actively encouraging cars to park there, though the Madrone does not yet legally share in the care and cost of the mews. People at the Radiance are about to contract with a towing company to have them all removed at considerable expense.

From personal experience with this issue in other spots in the neighborhood you will have to post "No Parking" signs before towing them away. B&A Towing is a company that other areas in the neighborhood seem to use. They can come out and meet with you but they would likely want to discuss with property managers too. The signs must be posted as a "fair warning" kind of thing, then you can call to have them towed from there.

That's the worst part: there are already eight signs that say "No Parking/Fire Lane" along both sides. They're actively ignored. After what our manager found out today, I believe the board will have to vote to have new signs put up that tell offenders where they can pay to retrieve their cars.

And we're finding out that contractors for the Public Safety Building next door are actively using our PRIVATE mews as their parking lot.

People also park in between the two park parcels. Notice that park management had to put in No Parking decals on the bollards? People think they can park wherever they please. Really one of my pet peeves.

Half the time, if it's not delivery vehicles, it's the landscaping company hired by Mission Bay Parks who block the right-of-way

As the "mews" between the parks is technically an area under the parks purview (and technically not a public thoroughfare) the maintenance crews for the parks are actually the only people allowed to park there while they are maintaining the park spaces. It is not idea but since the planners did not include parking spaces for maintenance vehicles in this area there are few other options.

Does Madrone not have loading docks? This is out of control!

They do, but they've apparently shot themselves in the foot by having an electric car charger installed in the loading dock, which prevents them from storing contractors/installers in the loading dock. But I view it as their problem, not the Radiance's, and not one that condones illegal parking.

This automotive disaster parks illegally here every evening to pick up cardboard.

And I've also heard from an employee in the Madrone that Nat Bosa--the owner of Bosa development, developer for the Madrone--is letting a personal friend stow his second car in the loading dock on China Basin. So Madrone has effectively removed the utility of all their loading docks due to questionable reasons.

I've complained to the VP for Allied Barton multiple times that their security guards are aiding and abetting in the illegal parking. I've yet to see any improvement or hear anything more than an acknowledgement.

The car blocking Madrone's second loading dock that's owned by Nat Bosa's personal friend.

SF311: Can we get the contact information of the supervisor of the enforcement division of the SFMTA's DPT?

The Madrone is continuing to violate a recorded legal easement agreement with the Radiance by not using their loading docks and encouraging residents, staff, and third parties to park on private property controlled by the Radiance. Perhaps if DPT would add the public right-of-way to their enforcement maps and being ticketing daily offenders, we might actually teach them to read the eight "No Parking Fire Lane" signs on our private property.

Thank you for reporting this issue. We are seeking further information. Please contact the Code Enforcement Hotline at 554-3977.

This issue is being closed. To report future code enforcement issues please contact the code enforcement hotline or report your issue using the up2code app. Thank you.