Deskripsyon
At both addresses. In there back yard one yard is as filthy as the other. Ruark had a shed built with out pulling a ticket code. She can not do that .walk her back yard you see so many Vilation,s why she has a gate up like prentice trying to keep code out of her back yard so code want know what all they have threw in there back yards. Time they clean up the mess Mr Myer lives with prentice. Could be cleaning there back yard up instead. Hide it or try to hide it out of view. City. Code needs to check both back yards . Ruark. Has one large over the road white Rv park in her front yard. And older truck park in back yard on grass lot of things in ruark back yard on grass. Is a vilation same for prentice as well
ay nagtanong din...
T. Is the property vacant or occupied?
S. Walang Ibinigay na Sagot
S. Walang Ibinigay na Sagot
T. Where is the junk located?
S. At 6597santaolina drive and 6593 santaolina drive in ba k of both yards clutter up
S. At 6597santaolina drive and 6593 santaolina drive in ba k of both yards clutter up
T. What items are in the yard?
S. Sorts of different clutter. Junk. Both addresses in there back yards Ruark has lot of vilation,s going on her in her back yard. She lives beside prentice at 6597santaolina
S. Sorts of different clutter. Junk. Both addresses in there back yards Ruark has lot of vilation,s going on her in her back yard. She lives beside prentice at 6597santaolina
10 Komentos
Kinilala City of Memphis (Beripikadong Opisiyal)
invasion-of-privacy (Rehistradong User)
The picture appears to show the neighbor's backyard. The neighbor has a wooden privacy fence.
The camera is capturing images of an area that is fenced in where there is an expectation of privacy.
In TN, it is illegal to record or photograph someone (without their consent) in a "place where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy." Invasion of privacy in TN is a Class A misdemeanor.
The camera pointed in the neighbor's backyard is also a civil issue in addition to the criminal issue.
TN has recognized the tort "inclusion upon seclusion."
To succeed in a claim for "intrusion upon seclusion" you would have to prove
1) an intentional intrusion by your neighbor
2) an actual expectation of privacy in the area the camera can see and
3) that expectation of privacy is reasonable to others besides yourself.
What's up with pointing cameras into your neighbor's fenced in backyard?
Isang anonimong user ng SeeClickFix (Rehistradong User)
Isang anonimong user ng SeeClickFix (Rehistradong User)
Isang anonimong user ng SeeClickFix (Rehistradong User)
Isang anonimong user ng SeeClickFix (Rehistradong User)
Isang anonimong user ng SeeClickFix (Rehistradong User)
invasion-of-privacy (Rehistradong User)
invasion-of-privacy (Rehistradong User)
Isinara City of Memphis (Beripikadong Opisiyal)