For your reference, this has been logged as case #230502-002186. You will be notified with updates via SeeClickFix.

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

Wow!!! The city of Albuquerque just lets this stand? The only time the city lifts a finger to keep the city clean is right before balloon fiesta, other than that the city is a a pig sty!

Thank you for submitting this request, it has been resolved. Notes:
-------
please contact DOT
-------

DOT covers what's on the edges of the freeway, right? This trash is on the south side of the fence than delineates the DOT property on the south side of I-40 eastbound. It is not on the freeway side of the fence.

This request has been received, and a case reference # will be posted shortly.

For your reference, this has been logged as case #230516-002831. You will be notified with updates via SeeClickFix.

Thank you for submitting this request, it has been resolved. Notes:
-------
we cannot address the encampments in the tunnels. please contact nm dot
-------

I don't think "resolved" means what you think it means. Refusing to clean up the trash or attempting to pass the buck to another agency who clearly does not oversee this area is not "resolving". The photo clearly shows trash OUTSIDE the tunnels. The photo does not show the inside of the tunnels. There are no encampments in the tunnels. There are no encampments outside the tunnels. There is only the mountain of trash that remains outside the tunnels from the homeless that were there in the past. They are not there now. Only their trash remains. I don't understand the resistance to this particular pile of trash. In the past, responses have always been appropriate and timely. What's different about this one?

This request has been received, and a case reference # will be posted shortly.

For your reference, this has been logged as case #230520-000062. You will be notified with updates via SeeClickFix.

Just for a little more clarity on this particular location, a couple of years ago, this EXACT SAME area was overgrown with wild elm trees, some of which were 40 feet tall. A CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE crew and heavy equipment came in over a period of a week, pulled all of the trees out, and fed them into a monster wood chipper. The pile of wood chip still sits on Los Altos golf course, just west of the tee box of the 18th hole. If this were, in fact, DOT property, do you think that would have occurred? It's CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE property.

I have come to the conclusion the city of Albuquerque does not really care about crime (drug sales and use,shoplifting, stolen vehicles that are abandoned, break-ins) blighted areas from homeless encampments on East Central! All the complaints mean nothing to the city! Will be placing my home for sale soon and moving out of Albuquerque!

Thank you for submitting this request, it has been resolved. Notes:
-------
to be addressed
-------

I do not understand.
Again, ignoring an issue does not "resolve" the issue.
What does "to be addressed" mean? Does it mean that the City intends to clean up this area in the immediate future? If so, I would think the issue would remain "open" until the clean-up is completed, wouldn't it?
Please, please, please, just send a crew out to clean up this mess before we get a heavy rain and the styrofoam cups and plastic water bottles get washed into the culvert and begin a journey that will deposit them in the Rio Grande River.