Description
There are two homeless campsites in the park. Today (11/3/15) at 2:30pm they had a camp fire going (flames approx. 2" high) There are two tents and a bunch of crap. These guys have been there a while.
The campsite is located on the edge of the park next to the hedge next to the 244 Lakeshore Dr location.
47 Comments
Acknowledged City of Oakland (Verified Official)
simplyblu (Registered User)
ChestnutMare (Registered User)
ChestnutMare (Registered User)
Bums are Bums (Guest)
Not sure why but the previous post with the photo was not uploaded. Maybe my choice words for the mayor and the homeless? Not sure but here is the photo that was taken 11/17/15 a week after the initial report.
Maybe this is liberal Oakland's solution to the housing crisis? Let them sleep in the parks? And where are these new residents going to the bathroom? You guessed it, where your children play. Thanks Oakland.
Tired of Bums (Guest)
As of 11/17/15 at 2pm the campers were still in the park. See Attached Photo.
San Francisco is going to be kicking out its homeless for the Super Bowl and if someone at the Mayor's Office doesn't pull their heads out of their collective butts, we are going to be overrun with the homeless.
The city doesn't always overlook camping. During the Occupy protests the city arrested, or threatened to arrest campers in the parks, but I guess the homeless have special privileges?
One has to wonder where these people are going to the bathroom...Oh that is right...IN THE DAMN PARK where children play.
Finally, Libby is trying to convince the public to fund a stadium. If she cannot keep a park free of campers, HTF are we to believe she can do this stadium deal?
David Coleman (Registered User)
simplyblu (Registered User)
simplyblu (Registered User)
BUMSBEGONE (Guest)
Being homeless is one thing. I am not against someone being homeless it is the camping that bothers me. Once you let them setup a camp then more serious issues begin to occur. Oakland has a history, especially with the homeless, of allowing these long-term encampments to continue.
All I am asking is that these people be rousted every single day and told to move on "No Camping"
HEAR THAT LIBBY? NO CAMPING IN THE PARKS.
BUMSCRAPINTHEPARK (Guest)
It is interesting that when debating the issue of recreation vehicles parked on the streets of Oakland the city noted the issue of hazardous materials
"And the long-term street storage of vehicles that are designed to function as domiciles presents unique problems related to storage and disposal of hazardous or septic waste and wastewater products."
But they don't seem to care if someone camps in a park where children play.
The same double standard exists with illegal dumping on Oakland. It is illegal to dump trash and hazardous materials in Oakland unless you are homeless.
So maybe it does pay to be homeless...Or maybe the homeless are just missing out on a business opportunity. I see it now. The Grand Opening of the Snow Park Homeless Encampment and Hazardous Materials Dump!
Libby, quit schmoozing with the NFL and get back to the quality of life issues in Oakland.
Why Does Libby Allow Bums to Crap in Parks Where Children Play? (Guest)
simplyblu (Registered User)
Where is Libby? In Paris (France not Texas) (Guest)
Where is Libby? (Guest)
simplyblu (Registered User)
WTF Libby? (Guest)
simplyblu (Registered User)
WTF Libby? (Guest)
Another day...same old Libby run city.
On today's walk around the Lake I spotted another camping site at Adam's Park (Harrison & Grand) that has been a constant irritation.
I hope, we, and the parks, can survive Libby.
simplyblu (Registered User)
Oakland Suffers from Libby's neglect (Guest)
simplyblu (Registered User)
Does Libby hate Oakland Parks? (Guest)
Libby does a number on Oakland's parks (Guest)
simplyblu (Registered User)
Closed the Complaint? WTF? (Guest)
simplyblu (Registered User)
Closed City of Oakland (Verified Official)
Reopened Does Libby really support homeless encampments in parks? (Guest)
Acknowledged City of Oakland (Verified Official)
Does Libby really support homeless encampments in parks? (Guest)
Libby and the city do not want to "criminalize" the homeless (even though camping and crapping in the parks is illegal) mainly because they do not have the moral backbone to go up against the homeless coalitions.
In my opinion, Libby and the city would rather allow kids to play in human waste in the parks rather than openly announce the policy on the encampments, because announcing the setting up of encampments in parks and allowing the homeless to use them as open toilets (the city is not providing portable toilets in the camps they are allowing) would probably get Libby recalled.
To a politician, and possibly a city worker, it might seem to be quite a dilemma. Do you allow the homeless to violate the laws of the city, putting its citizens at risk, because a group of people might get angry?
One solution might be to state, openly, that the city doesn't have the moral character to enforce the laws that protect its citizens. The city has done that in the past with petty crimes (burglary, car thefts, etc. as if those were petty crimes.) But no one is going to openly state they are letting people crap in the parks where children play and ever get elected again.
So Libby and the city, rather than dealing with the homeless problem, talk up the Raiders.
Different mayor, same city politics.
simplyblu (Registered User)
If a homeless person craps in the park and no one sees it... (Guest)
simplyblu (Registered User)
Libby isn't being honest about the homeless (Guest)
Over three months and counting.
It isn't just that Libby is allowing camping in the parks. The real problem is that Libby doesn't have the integrity to come out and say this is what she is doing and why.
simplyblu (Registered User)
Why does Libby hate Oakland parks? (Guest)
Why does Libby hate Oakland parks? (Guest)
simplyblu (Registered User)
WTF Libby? Four Months? (Guest)
simplyblu (Registered User)
Libby Shaaf - Hatin' on Oakland parks (Guest)
There is an article in the Tribune (http://www.insidebayarea.com/breaking-news/ci_29590793/oakland-mayor-schaaf-releases-housing-blueprint) that mentions Libby's intention to bring 17,000 housing units to Oakland. I wonder if she means to open more camps in the parks?
Anyway, attached is a photo of Snow Park taken recently (4 months after opening the initial complaint.)
Oakland has been Schaaf'ted! (Guest)
Oakland has been Schaaf'ted! (Guest)
Another one. Thank Libby Schaaf for people camping in city parks.
Oh, just a note about the new tag line Schaaf'ted. I had too much time on my hands and while walking about the lake I thought how we had been shafted by Libby (and sold a bag of rocks by Gerry Brown whom I will never trust again) but shafted soon became Schaaf'ted and a new moniker is born.
Oakland has been SCHAAF'TED (Guest)
FINALLY...FINALLY...FINALLY
After six months the camp in Snow Park is finally being dismantled. The campers left behind a couch, luggage, a stolen cart with refuse, a tent, and human waste but at least they are gone.
simplyblu (Registered User)
We Have Been SCHAAF'TED (Registered User)