Description
The addition of Colby as a slow street has made such an improvement in our neighborhood. We feel safe teaching our kids to ride their bikes in the street and it is incredible to see how many teens and adults are using the street for exercise (sitting on our stoop any given day we see at least 20 people pass every hour jogging, biking, walking their dogs and pushing strollers). Overall, traffic in the area seems less frantic with people driving more slowly on the side streets. This has been a such a positive change for our neighborhood, please do not take this away.
also asked...
A. Please do not end Colby's Slow Street status
A. Colby St (Woolsey St to Claremont Ave)
10 Comments
Acknowledged City of Oakland (Verified Official)
LeonDespres (Registered User)
S Bianco (Registered User)
My kids learned to ride bikes in Bart parking lot.
Acknowledge that slow steets serve a few. Parks serve all.
Mel (Registered User)
M (Registered User)
Instead of removing Slow Streets, which are beloved by many, can the city look for other ways to manage or minimize traffic in general without taking away these safe corridors for non-vehicle traffic?
It doesn't feel right that we have to choose between safe, efficient driving and safe, efficient cycling and walking.
To my neighbors who oppose Slow Streets: maybe there is a third option where we can all travel in our preferred ways and keep the streets safe for all, not just cars. Please don't underestimate how much value Slow Streets offer even if you don't personally use them. Many do and we should seek a solution that better serves everyone, including those who use and love safe corridors for cycling.
Natalie Tammen (Registered User)
James (Registered User)
Robert Prinz (Registered User)
Natalie, please refer to Oakland's Neighborhood Bike Route (NBR) Implementation Guide linked below, adopted in mid-2021. As a community volunteer I worked with city staff to develop this guide, as streets around Oakland that had existing NBR (aka bike boulevard) recommendations were being repaved, but without adding the speed humps and other minimum design details as recommended in the bike plan to help improve safety on what are supposed to be "all ages and abilities" bike routes.
This guide makes it more clear that these features are to be added by default with construction projects on these corridors going forward. But we also have to push the city to revisit recently repaved streets (including Colby, 32nd St, 11th Ave, 22nd Ave, Brookdale, Flora, and others) that will need these upgrades applied retroactively.
https://cao-94612.s3.amazonaws.com/documents/OaDOT_NBR_Guidance.pdf
James (Registered User)
Robb (Registered User)