No lights are needed at this intersection. I drive it frequently and the intersection without a traffic light moves very well. We don't need another traffic light in this part of the county. Be patient and be alert and you will be fine.,

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

Since 90% of the people who drive through there DON'T possess common sense, you're better off not going through this intersection at all. I've been hit once there, by someone not paying attention. My child was seriously injured in this intersection due to someone else's mistake. We no longer use this intersectoin, but if there were traffic lights there, we would. Anyone who doesn't want a light there is probably one of the jerks that just goes through the stop sign without fairly taking turns because they believe they're more important than the rest of us.

I agree that the intersection is a bit of a challenge, but I don't think that a traffic light would be an improvement.

Yes, it gets backed up at rush hour, particularly down Foulk and down Concord heading to Aston due to their disadvantaged positions at the stop signs. And sometimes when it's busy you get a driver either bullying through or being too hesitant and holding up the flow. But for the most part, drivers tend to move through sensibly. And most of the day, traffic isn't backed up there at all, so a light would simply slow things down.

I do wonder if it would help to remove the middle stop sign and make the remaining 5 explicitly 5-way stop signs. This would probably help Foulk & Concord flow better. But an expert on traffic flow would have to make a call like that.