Description
It is wasteful (both time and energy) to force people to carry and use change. Even more so for the city to continue handling cash when unnecessary
It is wasteful (both time and energy) to force people to carry and use change. Even more so for the city to continue handling cash when unnecessary
13 Comments
Acknowledged Bill Ward Director of Permitting and Inspections (Verified Official)
Ianelli (Verified Official)
Khalem Delat (Registered User)
Bill Ward Director of Permitting and Inspections (Verified Official)
SCormier (Verified Official)
BTV taxpayer (Guest)
Guest (Guest)
Solar (Guest)
Closed SCormier (Verified Official)
Khalem Delat (Registered User)
Here's a PDF that describes the solar-powered parking program in our doppelganger Portland, OR.
http://www.portlandoregon.gov/bibs/article/157993?
The thing is, it can take two or three minutes to pay, it raises the rates by quite a bit in every city that attempts it either powered by solar or wireless and the alternative is to rip up the sidewalk for power cables. We can't do that work in the winter, which means we'd need to do it in the summer when tourism is high and we don't want to displace the downtown parkers during that time.
Downtown Renter (Guest)
Andrew S. (Registered User)
@BTV Taxpayer - I think the expense gets recouped rather quickly considering two main factors. The first is a reduction on the cost side of having people collect and handle the cash. The 2nd factor is that supply can more easily be changed to meet demand. At peak hours we could theoretically increase the rate and at non-peak hours the rate of course could remain the same. Additionally, new avenues could open for monitoring compliance remotely and therefore each spot could generate more consistent revenue.
@Kahlem a quick search yielded a few results for solar powered options. I suspect that it is more than feasible to make this improvement without breaking up the sidewalks. Great idea!
BB (Registered User)