you will be able to find about 100+ postings for that on this site over the years. You would think being so close to city hall and the Dept of traffic and Parking that this would have been done when they built elm street.
Its the only intersection on a multilane street I can think of downtown that doesn't have a crosswalk.
Project 92-666 incorporates this intersection as part of replacing existing signal infrastructure. This project also includes the improvement of pedestrian signals. Currently, the project is in the design phase, with a projected approval of design by September of 2014. This date is not exact and may be subject to change. Additional information regarding this project will be posted here in the coming months.
Can the bike lane be extended all the way down Elm? It currently runs all the way from York to Orange, but doesn't for the last block. Narrowing the travel lanes could help reduce speeding, which is the root of the issue here.
8 Comments
It will never happen (Guest)
you will be able to find about 100+ postings for that on this site over the years. You would think being so close to city hall and the Dept of traffic and Parking that this would have been done when they built elm street.
Its the only intersection on a multilane street I can think of downtown that doesn't have a crosswalk.
MableX (Registered User)
guest (Guest)
Acknowledged Department of Transportation, Traffic and Parking (Registered User)
Doug Hausladen (Registered User)
CT Livable Streets Campaign (Registered User)
GregL (Registered User)
Closed TT&P Workflow Inegration (Verified Official)