It may not be illegal but they should know by now that the lanes ends. That makes them just plain rude and annoying. I will not yield to these people.

Same problem exists at Rt306 construction , I too refuse to yeild , even had a guy spit on my car because I wouldnt let him in !

This content is currently blocked. The content is either under review by SeeClickFix or has been confirmed by SeeClickFix for violation(s) of SeeClickFix Terms of Use (https://www.civicplus.com/terms-of-service). Content that aligns with SeeClickFix Terms of Use will be posted, and content that does not align with our Terms of Use will not be permitted for public viewing.

"Not all of us want to sit in lines for 10 minutes waiting for lights to change"

DUH !! Sigh , none of us do , thats the point ! But we all do , well except you of course , cuz after all you are kind of a big deal , Not !

You know whats really annoying...

Taking the detour from reeves to lost nation, only to have a line of cars never let you into the lane.

Some of us have no choice but to go all the way to the end of the closed lane, because nobody EVER lets us in.

I'm with "oh really", turning out from the reeves rd detour is a major pain. I'm lucky if I can get over before the end of the lane.

Tell me, in what book of rules does it say I must funnel myself into a mile long line when the other lane doesn't end for some distance? That is sheeple behavior, and I guess it's what keeps governments in control, but certainly not rude. I will use that open lane till the very last minute, as it was designed to allow me to do. If you don't want to let me in when I get there, I'll just wait till the guy behind you does; no biggie.

Not a fix it issue. Not illeagal. People will always have various reasons for using the closed lane. See reeves guy for example.

We all need to get somewhere in the morning and these ignorant rude people just mess up the traffic even more by thinking they can just drive in the right lane and cut in front of those of us staying in the left lane. I'm not talking about those who are coming out of one of the houses on the right side or coming off of Hurricane. This is for the idiots who just ride the right lane all the way to the end and they do know better.

@ Dee Dee & Mr, it seems to me, wolves isn't the aggressive one. Dee Dee threatened bodily harm. 306 has had the same problems with merging two lanes into one, by the freeway. I have to make a left turn onto 306, to go north, thus, i'm in the lane that ends some 100 ft or so in the distance. Often times I've found no one wants to let me merge into the curb lane--too worried I'll be in front of them, I suppose. Anyway, I can't stay put in the same spot with my blinker on. Who's the rude ones now??? Wolves didn't say what their circumstance was. For all you know, it could be very similar to mine. I am angry that people are too rude to let me in. I know in my circumstance, if someone threatened me with bodily harm because they were "Road Raging" and I had a gun, I too would use it to protect myself. I'm a woman and thank God I have inalienable rights. Don't assume I'm a man, just because I would shoot someone to protect myself. So, I have to side with Wolves, here.

just because its not illegal to do something doesn't make it right. If you use laws to defend rude behavior, then you have no morals.

I work in Columbus all week. I call the "Specials". They think they are so special that they are not required to wait in line. I find it very frustrating. It is unfortunate that I drive my employer's commercial vehicle and I am not suppose to react to this type of "special" driving. I do try to prevent them from squeezing in but down here they are very persistant!

While I try to let those in who are merging, if you dont put on a turn signal I have no idea what you are wanting to do!

If you are in the right lane that ends and no turn signal on I am going to assume you are turning right off of Lost Nation not squeezing in at the last minute.

Courtesy goes both ways!

I think that it would be nice if some of those people on the side of the road to be a little more courteous. I don’t really care that you zoom down the lane that is about to close but when most of you attempt to force your way back into traffic as though you have the right of way is wrong. And I think that it is against the law for NOT yielding the right of way. You should get a ticket for that and that is something the law CAN do and should. I think that this behavior slows down the traffic. Why do some of you people have to be so darn rude? OK enough complaining, God bless and enjoy your day.
Karl.

Hello,

Please remember to keep your comments clean. See our Terms of Use for details on what is acceptable: http://seeclickfix.com/terms_of_use

Thanks,
Annelies

Karl is exactly correct. Just because you zoom down the open lane doesn't mean that we should just let you in. Most of the time these guys start creeping into the next lane forcing themselves in, which is clearly unsafe. If you can't find a spot in the lane then wait until one becomes available.

And on a side note if I see that a person zooms past me in attempts to move up in line had a perfectly good opportunity to get over behind me there is no chance I will let them in. However, if I see that the person that is zooming past had no choice to be in that lane because of turning out of a street/house/etc then of course I would let them in, it wasn't their fault they had to be in that lane. To sum it up, if you choose to be in that lane that is closing then you should live with the fact that we DON'T HAVE TO LET YOU IN.

Ok lets all say thank you to Annelies for the censorship of the public forum online. The comments removed are just that comments and in no way violated any terms of service from seeclickfix because those that posted public comments are not bound by the "TOS". The reason the comments are not bound by such "TOS" is because any Jane, Joe, or anyone else can post a public comment without any agreement with The News-Herald. At no time were any curse words used or material felt to be offensive by anyone able to consent to a contract which your TOS state they must be, this is 18 years old. I for one am sick and tired of this so called News site censoring discussion reguarding a topic when this is the case. I understand this is the News-Herald's site, they can edit or remove material contained there in however I feel it is completely unethical for it "The News" to do so without merit. Shame on you Annelies and your censors at The News-Herald. If you want to remove comments and your reason is your TOS then what you should do is force all comments to be made by users with a user account like the PD does, however here this isn't the case and the PD doesn't censor comments like this. Perhapse this is the reason you see more discussion on the PD's site, perhapse it is also why as the subcription rates fall for The News-Herald, they remain steady for one of the top 20 papers in the country. My suggetion is to look at what they do and how they do it, & stop unnecessary censorship. UGH!!

This issue is merely linked through the News-Herald's site. However, it is in no way a part of their site. Rather, it is a part of SeeClickFix's website. And, as I said earlier, it does violate our terms of use: any content that is "unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable" is strictly prohibited.

SeeClickFix is all in favor of free speech and we encourage debate. However, please refrain from comments that violate SCF's Terms of Use.

Thanks,
The SeeClickFix team

Thank you realist, I agree with what you say as well. I purposely allow cars to get in front of me when I am away from were the road ends as I get to the gap then I will refuse cars to get in, especially the cars that did not take the opportunity that I had giving them.
I also agree with you too Mr. Courtesy, I just would not choose to do any road rage stuff though. I think that was the posts that were deleted I am glad, sorry to say that to you. There is a thin line between being a victim and being the aggressor. Some drivers, people in my opinion are so self-centered and so arrogant that they don’t even know what they are doing is offending anybody; the same goes for the victims reactions to these drivers, or people see? What I am saying is, sometimes my reaction to a problem just simply creates another problem. God bless and have a great day.
Karl.

Can anyone here please tell me where I advocated anything related to violence? I cant believe the bandwagon of misinformed people here. Look at my posts -never said anything about violence -only that some people carry guns because they are rude and probably need them...WOW

WOW censored for what? I didnt swear or say anything inappropriate. -Oh it must have been flagged by that guy I was directing my comments to. He can dish it out on the road but cannot take it here -even when hiding behind a laptop. His comments are gone too, weird.

To all, we all know that the road construction is there, yet we still get upset whe we get caught in it,
maybe if we left our homes a half hour sooner,we
wouldn't get so upset or have too rush...

Dee Dee Dee,
I think I know the content of the Concealed Carry manual. Just an FYI, Dee, I'm fairly certain, moving into a line of traffic from a closed lane does not constitute "escalating a confrontation". Also, a vehicle, such as a car, truck, or motorcycle can, and has been used as an instrument of deadly force capable of causing "serious bodily harm". Thus, is considered a weapon. And yes, so are fists and such. There is a plethora of cases that are available to site, many here in NE Ohio, where "serious bodily harm and Death" has been caused by fists alone. So, your argument holds no credibility.

Again, it is violent whack-jobs such as yourself, that I became a concealed carry licence holder.

All I can say is, don't cut and paste online manuals and attempt to interpret them, when you have no idea what they mean. It makes you look foolish and diminished the credibility you so obviously seek.

And, no, I do not want to 'grow a pair', thank you. I'm fine to have never had them in the first place and think my 'taa-taas' are just fine.

Oh, and jump back on the "Crazy Train" from whence you came, Nutter.

I wear Depends and cannot wait for red lights to change, 20 MPH school zones and cannot wait in long lines of traffic so that's why I zoom. You should see the inside of my car....and the smell.....oye vay

Thing is Mr.Sheep is that your original post proved you Sir are the arrogant one. That you Sir are disrespectful by gloating your rude persona by cutting in front of those patiently waiting. I did read somewhere on this post Sir that YOU said you would use a weapon..Perhaps if you didn't commit to actions that you thought would result in a confrontation then YOU Sir wouldn't have a need to say you would use one. As far as the manual goes Sir, you should read it, English can be taught throughout the area. You Sir will not put the property I have worked hard for at risk because YOU Sir decided to be the dysfunctional part of the community. Some people wont speak up on the road Sir, some will reserve their voice and allow this to continue to happen, however Sir I am not one of those people, and because you race up in the outside lane, cut off those patiently waiting, and have a gun doesn't prove you got a set Sir. There is reaction to action Sir as you can see by this post and the overwhelmingly number of folks who unlike you Sir wait patiently and want you to stop your actions Sir, remember that it is YOU Sir who can stop anytime and help to make things better, yet YOU Sir carry on with you ignorant actions Sir, eventually you will get a reaction. If a fist hit you once Sir you couldn't ascertain your life was in any danger Sir, nor could you stick around Sir, You Sir have an obligation to leave Sir, run away Sir, so as the manual says Sir, further more Sir, there have never been any cases in NE Ohio Sir where 2 individuals of approximate age Sir where as those 2 individuals got involved into minimal physical confrontation Sir were either are justified in shooting the other Sir. What that means Sir is if a fist hits you once Sir you have no justification in using your weapon Sir. You Sir may need to take a self defense class Sir instead of thinking you can rely solely on your weapon Sir. An English class would also be advised Sir..

Hey you all, Karl here, I would like to comment on a comment thanks. Diarrhea you have my fullest support for you cause. In fact I think that the city, county, state or even the federal Government should give you a special vehicle to either have a siren or a personal toilet built right into it. I would for one give you the right of way every time and all of the time, lol. Sorry about that but it is funny you know. I guess the old saying is “ You never know what your neighbor is going through.” Diarrhea good luck with that, God bless and have a great day.
Karl.

@ Wolves like LeBron: It is You that needs an English class--at least how to construct ideas and opinions in proper written form. Anyhoo... I don't think I read anything in Wolves' statement that admitted to 'cutting' in front of anyone. What he said was people let him in. That in now way, sir, could be considered as endangering your, or anyone else's, property. You are not the savior of the meek and mild who choose not to use their voice to assert their rights. If that's the position you want/need to assume in life, I suggest you move to a country with a totalitarian government, where you can strap on your rifle and enforce your moral attitudes. Otherwise, crawl back under your rock. Just an FYI, Mr. Wing-nut, I'm a concealed carry licence holder, too. I'm a 120lb, disabled women, and work in a very bad neighborhood. I, like many people, would be found justified if some road-rage nutter, such as yourself, were to display physical aggression toward me. Regardless of your opinions, sir, they are only your opinions. They don't have any baring on the law and my rights to protect myself against violence. You would know that, had you yourself taken the CC exam, but they bar nutters (Thank G*d) from getting that far in the process.

People please calm down; this is simply about driving habits. I hope that this does not turn into some type of road rage in the future, especially involving guns. Although I am not happy about the poor decisions of others wanting to shave like 2 to 5 minutes off of their driving, I would gladly let that car cut in line to shave off a life time of the consequences of that person pulling out his or her trusty 22 rifle. I say what about the poor innocent goose who suffers from getting ran over by a car whose driver cannot wait most likely 5 minutes for the poor stupid, don’t know any better animal who simply wants to cross a road. Look at the senseless pain in that people!!!!!! 5 minutes at the most!!!!! Sick!!!! That is what makes me upset. No I will not resolve to any type of road rage, but we need to really take a look at ourselves and say, am I part of the problem or am I a part of the solution. You know who you are. Please choose to be a part of the solution, God bless.
Karl.

Lil wolf cub,

Perhaps you have strayed too far from your momma tiny cub.

Since you haven't followed along with the original conversation Ima break it down right here because you decided to "cut in" on the forum. Your gun doesn't protect you from all issues you weak pathetic fools come across.

"You needs" an English class? Really ? Well critique me ole wise one. lol. "in now way" lol What ya teaching ghetto English 101?

I find it interesting that you stated you were disabled. If you are under the influence of, take, have, or possess any kind of pain regulator, muscle relaxing prescription, or some other altering substance including alcohol & you have a weapon on you regardless of a license to carry or not you are in violation of the law. You "needs" to know that it is against the law to carry or possess any weapon under disability. You "needs" to file for relief in accordance with the Ohio Revised Code. If you haven't, you are BREAKING the law. The fact you state your disabled as though it entitles you to some superior classification tells me you have/take meds.

What were you saying? Oh right you are disabled and working in a "bad area" huh.. I am sure that is probably at some gas station or convenience store & under the table or less than $760 per month, right?

Instead of coming here and spewing your garbage, you should actually read what the AG says where and when you might be able to brandish such weapon to begin with. Google and YouTube might come into some good use for you. Heck, Google "Ohio shooting justified" and see how many people get the justified classification in court & what circumstances they were in. I mean you have access to a PC since you posted your comments on the net. You have time since you actually work about 4 hours or less, 2-3 times per week right?

Are you the Nostradamus of the area ole wise one? My property is at risk. Are there some who race up the closed outside lane and wait patiently? Where? Your meds got your thinking all messed up because if the person who races up the lane does it to cut themselves time they WILL NOT just sit there waiting patiently as the line goes by. DUH! If the 2nd or 3rd person hasn't let them in yet they WILL cut into the line. I mean how ignorant is it to think they wont? VERY! If you think logically this creates possible situations that wouldn't exist if the person just got in line. At the least it would create a situation where people become distracted, maybe by thinking about the person racing up, maybe their radio, Ipod, texting, any number of things because their thoughts originally designated toward operation of the automobile shifts as they sit waiting for fools who engage in this behavior.

That shift in focus creates more RISK for the others around. If the person coming up the outside lane doesn't cut off someone to get in they at the least cause further delay in the line causing a further lack of focus, perhaps while waiting the person behind me hits the gas accidentally. I mean is it really necessary for me to state that & write out possible examples?

Actions have reactions intended or not. Didn't you learn that in 3rd grade science class or was it 2nd grade when you dropped out? Texting while driving is an issue because it distracts the driver, their mind shifts into a different state of thinking, not completely focused on the operation of the automobile. Is it no wonder many want this activity banned? That distraction is greater in a backed up line of traffic! Is your mind too simple to see that ignorant actions or activities such as this has many intended or unintended consequences?

You say, you're in a bad area, how does any area get bad? Certain people with disregarding activity, isnt that what makes an area bad? Kinda like this activity that is being discussed.

Listen, your words have no infliction of fear, your gun doesn't scare me, if you engage in this behavior in the area eventually you will deal with me. My only hope for you is that you take some of your free time to go back to school and get at least a GED. Prove to the community that, at the least, you have some form of logical thinking because of what you previously wrote just doesn't do that.

Also, you are free to write any court/attorney to ask , "If I am confronted with any type of physical aggression can I shoot the person?" I'd like you to come back and post the exact words you get in response or just go read the darn manual geez..

Learn how to get a job and work for things instead of working the system, learn how to deal with issues instead of being passive-aggressive.

You came on this forum a month after the discussion began, after 2 comments between the parties of the discussion got deleted and removed, your view was to try and stake dominance by trying to oppress ("crawl back under a rock") ("You're not the savior") with attempts to insult/degrade ("You needs lol an English class") ("Mr.Wingnut") while spewing your own propaganda (" I, like many people, would be found justified") without knowing the conversation fully, the law, or any meaning of the words you typed. Seems to me as though you are trying to live in a totalitarian like state that you recommended for myself. Your own comments above refer to the definition of such ideology and after all, you are more prepared for that kind of life, you allow the government to pay your way, now don't you.

I do not need to boast I have a gun, nor proclaim I have a CCW. I do not need to have people care for me or pay my way, I do not need other to speak for me on my behalf. I do not need to mindlessly chime in on a conversation without knowledge of the facts, I do not need to be rude to others patiently waiting in a line of traffic. Maybe just maybe lil cub its time for you to grow up and time to be an adult!! If you can't handle the fire get the heck outta the kitchen and stop cooking.

The SeeClickFix Team would like to remind everyone to do their best to keep the conversation positive and constructive. For more specific guidance, please see the SeeClickFix Terms of Use.