Description
Erected Gated Driveway onto another street on which property does not reside without Variance. Negatives are that it displaces parking, blocks emergency vehicles and sanitation trucks if allowed. Also, creates a safety and snow removal issue. All from an absentee landlord that has allowed property to fall into disrepair, attracting rats and vagrants.
2 Comments
MeTwo (Guest)
I don't get this. If they own the property at the end of the street, why can't they access their back yard/driveway ? They pay taxes and should have a right to access their property. What's next? The next person who puts a gate to their back yard will get summoned into court for illegal access? Life is too short....let it go!
MeTwo
Spineraker (Guest)
The property had an addition built where they could of had a driveway from their own street. Now they wish forr the right to have parking in front of the house and a driveway connecting to a street on which they do not reside. The negative issues that present themselves are already listed. They should not have parking in front of their house and in the back while the house on Stowe becomes unable to have on street parking. Tax payers on Stowe should not lose parking on their street due to a tax payer on Langley, who already has AMPLE parking on their street. The party on Langley also appears to have altered Stowe as it is 3 to 3.5 ft. wider in a direction that favors this questionable gate.