I agree it is very dangerous to cyclists WHO DON'T EVEN SLOW DOWN on approaching this crossing. A driver who has committed himself to making a right turn will not have SEEN a cyclist at that point. It is the speed at which cyclists arrive at the crossing that is the problem.
It is also perfectly legal for a driver to make a "right turn on red after stop". To see if Southbound Van Dyke is clear to enable such a turn requires pulling forward across the pedestrian walkway.
I have done this when there is not a cyclist in sight, only to have them appear, then wave their fists at me because I have puled forward.
Let's face it, the real issue is that cyclists are NOT walking and therefore the time it takes them to get to the crossing is so short that they will take a driver by surprise. Are they not supposed to stop to make sure it's safe to cross first?
Perhaps a couple of chicanes to slow the bikes down would work?????

Motorists like Keith who pull forward and block the crosswalk are breaking Washington Township's traffic ordinances. The Township has adopted the Michigan State Police Uniform Traffic Code, which states:

R 28.1438 Rule 438. Entering intersection or crosswalk; obstructing traffic prohibited; violation as
civil infraction.
(1) A driver shall not enter an intersection or a marked crosswalk unless there is sufficient space on the other side of the intersection or crosswalk to accommodate the vehicle he or she is operating without obstructing the passage of other vehicles or pedestrians, notwithstanding any traffic-control signal indication to proceed.
(2) A person who violates this rule is responsible for a civil infraction.

There should also be a no turn on red for EB 28 Mile and SB Van Dyke. A separate left turn sign for Van Dyke would resolve motorists who turn and block traffic, which also breaks the above mentioned law.

The suggestion of adding stop signs on the trail when a ped signal exist is not allowed. That's analogous to adding a stop sign at a traffic light.

I understand that turning right on red after a stop is legal however, I believe you have to stop before the cross walk and slowly approach the corner. Not just go to the corner and then stop. I lived in the Woodfield Sub for many years and I've watched motorists ignore the crosswalk numerous times. Yes, the cyclists should also follow the law but if a car hits that cyclist no matter who is at fault who is going to suffer the most? And if the cyclist dies is the driver of the car not going to feel bad because "they didn't follow the law"? Yes, the corner needs addressed and hopefully the issues are resolved for all.

Stopping before the cross-walk and proceeding slowly if there are no pedestrians or cyclists is exactly what I do.
What prompted my report here is that I was involved in a verbal altercation with a cyclist earlier this week.
He WAS NOT in view as I moved forward, but was suddenly RIGHT THERE, banging on my car.
He was in full racing gear and was upset that I had "ruined his time by making him stop".
Presumably he was timing himself over a certain distance.
I watched him continue South and within a very short space of time he was up to at least 30mph,
At that speed it is no wonder he suddenly appeared after I had checked both directions to make sure it was clear.
My original 3 seconds elapsed time was based on cyclists riding at normal speeds, not racing!
Can I get some clarification here? These are PEDESTRIAN cross-walks. Seeing pedestrians is not a problem. What does the law require cyclists to do - ride across without slowing down, or dismount and walk across? A cyclist at full speed does not fit the definition of a pedestrian.
I have not hit ANYONE in 45 years driving and I don't want to start now, but this intersection is an accident waiting to happen if the cyclists do not slow down before crossing.

Sorry for the misunderstanding...Everything we've mentioned is an issue! Cyclists obviously need educated and forced to follow the law just like cars. Hope someone gets this addressed before a tragedy occurs. Maybe they could license bikes and then motorists can get their plate number and report them?? What about a (Large) sign a few feet back from the road crossing that tells cyclists to get off and walk their bike across the street???

I live right there at the intersection and witnessed this exact situation with an elderly lady in a car turning right on to 28 mile from SB Van Dyke. She was 100% in the wrong and thankfully the person on the bike was not hurt. As a driver you need to double and triple check as you do NOT have the right of way, no matter how fast a cyclist is traveling. In fairness, any local cyclist that doesn't slow down at an intersection, is just playing roulette with their well being. Stay safe out there everyone.

I believe the bicyclists have stop signs and must stop before crossing at the crosswalk. Drivers are supposed to yield to bicyclists in the crosswalk, but they are not supposed to cycle right across without stopping first.

Cyclists are ignoring the stop signs. In fact they are ignoring the "Don't walk" signal too - I had one cross in front of me when I made a right turn on red from SB Van Dyke to WB 28mile. East-west traffic had the green so NO-ONE should have been crossing at that point.
Ya can't fix stupid, I have no more suggestions as to how to improve the situation, so I am closing this report!